Duran Duran front man Simon Le Bon on a life of great videos, great gigs, and, yes, great hair.
You have shared a post that offers payment for clicks.
To receive credit and payment, please sign in.
Learn more about paid sharing
by signing in you agree to the terms of use
create your account
I just want to read stuff
Awesome. Browse pages and subscribe to the ones you like.
I want to post and earn money
Create a page about something you're passionate about and post links to articles, stories and more. Trunqd is 100% free to use, and we will pay you 80% of all ad revenue on your pages. It takes less than 60 seconds to sign in and create your first post.
I want to advertise
You can create an ad on any page within seconds.
sign in with facebook
If you prefer to sign in with email, click here.
create new subaccount
Duran Duran front man Simon Le Bon on a life of great videos, great gigs, and, yes, great hair.
It’s not like Van Halen is in any danger of being erased from the historical record. Their commercial popularity has been certified and there’s a collective acknowledgment regarding the quality of their musicianship. Pretty much anyone who’s seen the video for “Panama” views the band as idealized avatars for a euphoric, consequence-free, hyper-intoxicated lifestyle that (a) could only exist in Southern California, (b) could never exist today, and (c) probably never existed at all, unless you were a member of this specific band. The abstract idea of Van Halen remains iconic. The individual musical compositions, however, tend to be lumped into two categories that resist close reading. Songs from the Roth era are marginalized as party anthems designed for strippers, subscribers to Guitar World magazine, and guys with unusually strong opinions about how many cylinders a car engine should have. Songs from the Sammy Hagar era are marginalized as well-crafted, non-bombastic radio hits that you can like but never love, unless you’re Sammy or whoever concocted the marketing strategy for Crystal Pepsi. It’s tempting to view Van Halen as having many versions of only two songs (one recorded prior to 1985 and the other recorded after). This is reductive and wrong. Moreover, it’s an unintentional result of the group’s technical proficiency. Eddie Van Halen was the most inventive guitar player of his generation, but he’s also a surprisingly stern formalist. Rarely does EVH’s music dabble in prog or inaccessibility; instead, he jams all his unorthodoxy into the claustrophobic confines of a traditional four-piece rock configuration, performed at a volume typically reserved for volcanoes. The core riffs are sophisticated, but also remarkably minimalist; the solos are overstuffed and a little self-derivative, but no two are identical and none of them are easy. The downside to this formalism is a superficial sense that many of these songs are interchangeable. The upside is a depth of creativity that takes years to untangle, delivered in a working-class package that is roughly the musical equivalent of eating hot pizza and drinking cold beer. Read it all here: http://www.vulture.com/2018/09/chuck-klosterman-ranks-all-131-van-halen-songs.html