Pundits are weaponizing disgust to fuel violence, and it’s affecting our humanity
You have shared a post that offers payment for clicks.
To receive credit and payment, please sign in.
Learn more about paid sharing
by signing in you agree to the terms of use
create your account
I just want to read stuff
Awesome. Browse pages and subscribe to the ones you like.
I want to post and earn money
Create a page about something you're passionate about and post links to articles, stories and more. Trunqd is 100% free to use, and we will pay you 80% of all ad revenue on your pages. It takes less than 60 seconds to sign in and create your first post.
I want to advertise
You can create an ad on any page within seconds.
sign in with facebook
If you prefer to sign in with email, click here.
create new subaccount
Pundits are weaponizing disgust to fuel violence, and it’s affecting our humanity
Einstein refused to believe in the inherent unpredictability of the world. Is the subatomic world insane, or just subtle?
Vastly extended life spans would bring dazzling opportunities — and daunting risks
It is on this second, nontechnical level where the controversies lie. Two different theories are commonly proposed to explain lift, and advocates on both sides argue their viewpoints in articles, in books and online. The problem is that each of these two nontechnical theories is correct in itself. But neither produces a complete explanation of lift, one that provides a full accounting of all the basic forces, factors and physical conditions governing aerodynamic lift, with no issues left dangling, unexplained or unknown. Does such a theory even exist?